2.35:1, exactly 10 seconds. Same overcast winter daylight, same Kensington Avenue corridor (real street), same cold high-contrast documentary look. Third-person handheld with subtle shake; long-lens compression (85–135mm), shallow DOF; background faces unidentifiable blur. No on-screen text/UI/subtitles.
Wardrobe lock unchanged across all parts (same jacket for @konglingchao ).
Action & cuts (5–7 cuts, continuous timeline; WHY the homeless person gets angry):
(0.0–1.6s) 135mm tele: homeless person sits near stoop/storefront edge; camera lingers half a beat too long, creating the impression of filming without consent.
(1.6–3.2s) 100mm tele two-shot: @konglingc.noirwander steps in respectfully, but operator framing still slightly elevated and pointed, triggering discomfort.
(3.2–4.8s) 135mm tele: homeless person notices lens and reacts sharply; framing stays respectful, no humiliation.
(4.8–7.6s) 100mm tele: @konglingc.noirwander asks the exact line below; @konglingchao stays a step behind, open palms, backing the camera down slightly; black down jacket remains clearly visible.
(7.6–10.0s) 120mm tele: homeless person answers the exact line below, then sets a boundary; the two leads step back and lower the camera angle to de-escalate.
Dialogue (sync sound; keep roles exact):
• @konglingc.noirwander (English): “Hi, we’re documenting the street situation. Are you okay talking for a minute?”
• Homeless person (English): “Yeah… just trying to get through the day. It’s rough out here.”
• Homeless person (English, irritated): “But stop filming me like that. Back up.”
Continuity lock: they retreat one step, then continue down the sidewalk into PART 3 without a location jump.
Negative: no music/narration/subtitles/UI; no identifying details; no graphic drug use; no weapons/violence.